<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stupid Email of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Illustration Sketchblog of Brad Fitzpatrick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:14:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl@Where to Buy Acai Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-57267</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl@Where to Buy Acai Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-57267</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting little controversy - I suppose it really depends on how one looks at it and how we want to use the image. If we&#039;re looking at it as a separate piece of art to place in a collection or something, then I can see where someone might value it at $15 or more. On the other hand, if I just need an image of a squirrel to put in a blog post somewhere, I really can&#039;t see myself paying $15 a pop for this. 

But either way, as long as we have some semblance of a free market, you should be able to charge whatever you want for it, and if you can find enough buyers you can probably do pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting little controversy &#8211; I suppose it really depends on how one looks at it and how we want to use the image. If we&#8217;re looking at it as a separate piece of art to place in a collection or something, then I can see where someone might value it at $15 or more. On the other hand, if I just need an image of a squirrel to put in a blog post somewhere, I really can&#8217;t see myself paying $15 a pop for this. </p>
<p>But either way, as long as we have some semblance of a free market, you should be able to charge whatever you want for it, and if you can find enough buyers you can probably do pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc@BoozeMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-56927</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc@BoozeMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-56927</guid>
		<description>You know what? I&#039;ve just re-read this lady&#039;s post and I agree with her. You want to charge her how much for the squirrel drawing? Clearly she would be a fool to consider paying you (or the tattoo artist for that matter) when she can simply catch a squirrel of her own from the local park for free, strap it to her arm with strong rubber bands, and draw round it with a permanent marker.

Fitz, you should be ashamed of yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what? I&#8217;ve just re-read this lady&#8217;s post and I agree with her. You want to charge her how much for the squirrel drawing? Clearly she would be a fool to consider paying you (or the tattoo artist for that matter) when she can simply catch a squirrel of her own from the local park for free, strap it to her arm with strong rubber bands, and draw round it with a permanent marker.</p>
<p>Fitz, you should be ashamed of yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc@BoozeMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-56926</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc@BoozeMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-56926</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what &quot;unfreasonable&quot; is, but I think it should enter the lexicon. Some of Dubya&#039;s made-up words should be introduced into the mainstream too. How about &quot;unreasonablificationment&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;unfreasonable&#8221; is, but I think it should enter the lexicon. Some of Dubya&#8217;s made-up words should be introduced into the mainstream too. How about &#8220;unreasonablificationment&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-51393</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-51393</guid>
		<description>Daisy,

Do you know how to capitalize your name? Do you know that you should have used the version of the word &quot;to&quot; spelled &quot;too&quot; when saying &quot;too expensive?&quot; An ellipse uses three periods, not two (or is it &quot;to&quot; or &quot;too&quot;), and certainly not five. You might want to be careful about throwing the word &quot;stupid&quot; around in the future. 

Brad is incredibly talented and his pricing is a bargain. I&#039;m glad this &quot;stupid&quot; e-mail was published so people can become more enlightened about the true value of art. And, by the way, cartooning is one of the more difficult art forms to master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daisy,</p>
<p>Do you know how to capitalize your name? Do you know that you should have used the version of the word &#8220;to&#8221; spelled &#8220;too&#8221; when saying &#8220;too expensive?&#8221; An ellipse uses three periods, not two (or is it &#8220;to&#8221; or &#8220;too&#8221;), and certainly not five. You might want to be careful about throwing the word &#8220;stupid&#8221; around in the future. </p>
<p>Brad is incredibly talented and his pricing is a bargain. I&#8217;m glad this &#8220;stupid&#8221; e-mail was published so people can become more enlightened about the true value of art. And, by the way, cartooning is one of the more difficult art forms to master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisy</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-51154</link>
		<dc:creator>daisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-51154</guid>
		<description>What is more stupid, the e-mail she sent or you publishing it? You show right of the bat you are highly unprofessional here.....sorry dude..you just turned me off.....

(and FYI I agree with her complaint about the price, 15 dollars is way to expensive, there are numerous sites where you can get better designs for not even half of the money.....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is more stupid, the e-mail she sent or you publishing it? You show right of the bat you are highly unprofessional here&#8230;..sorry dude..you just turned me off&#8230;..</p>
<p>(and FYI I agree with her complaint about the price, 15 dollars is way to expensive, there are numerous sites where you can get better designs for not even half of the money&#8230;..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50485</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50485</guid>
		<description>People can be so naive. I wonder what she &quot;does for a living&quot; because I bet she wouldn&#039;t give you her services for free. Maybe you&#039;ll see her in the McDonald&#039;s drive-thru and not only can you ask to see her way-cool squirrel tatoo, but maybe she&#039;ll up-size your fries for free!

I love your art. Wish more people could understand the talent behind the computer screen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can be so naive. I wonder what she &#8220;does for a living&#8221; because I bet she wouldn&#8217;t give you her services for free. Maybe you&#8217;ll see her in the McDonald&#8217;s drive-thru and not only can you ask to see her way-cool squirrel tatoo, but maybe she&#8217;ll up-size your fries for free!</p>
<p>I love your art. Wish more people could understand the talent behind the computer screen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Woodman</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Woodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50005</guid>
		<description>Lovely.  The &quot;actually work for a living&quot; bit is priceless. I&#039;ll bet she isn&#039;t a big patron of her local art museum.

Seems to me that she is looking at your squirrel as a mass-produced retail product.  Your &quot;competition&quot; in value is anything she can buy at Walmart for $15.

It is easy to see why &quot;starving artist&quot; is axiomatic, if not just redundant. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely.  The &#8220;actually work for a living&#8221; bit is priceless. I&#8217;ll bet she isn&#8217;t a big patron of her local art museum.</p>
<p>Seems to me that she is looking at your squirrel as a mass-produced retail product.  Your &#8220;competition&#8221; in value is anything she can buy at Walmart for $15.</p>
<p>It is easy to see why &#8220;starving artist&#8221; is axiomatic, if not just redundant. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helge Olav Helgesen</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50003</link>
		<dc:creator>Helge Olav Helgesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50003</guid>
		<description>Cool squirrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool squirrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50001</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradfitzpatrick.com/weblog/465/stupid-email-of-the-week/#comment-50001</guid>
		<description>Heh. &quot;I want to put your picture on my body permanently, and I love it so much it&#039;s worth exactly zero to me to be able to do that.&quot;

Wow. I hope she pays more than $15 for the tattoo. Unless it&#039;s done by a hack it&#039;ll cost 15-20 times the price you charge for the royalty-free, unlimited rights to the image. Something tells me this may be a teenage girl, one who&#039;s in for a bit of a rude awakening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. &#8220;I want to put your picture on my body permanently, and I love it so much it&#8217;s worth exactly zero to me to be able to do that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow. I hope she pays more than $15 for the tattoo. Unless it&#8217;s done by a hack it&#8217;ll cost 15-20 times the price you charge for the royalty-free, unlimited rights to the image. Something tells me this may be a teenage girl, one who&#8217;s in for a bit of a rude awakening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
